<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dragon Naturally Speaking 9 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/</link>
	<description>Tech News/Reviews/How To's</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harry Patapanian</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-233988</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Patapanian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-233988</guid>
		<description>I run DNS 9 and have had no problems until recently.    I think it is a brilliant office tool. My global commands was working perfectly until recently, when I discovered that new voice commands were not being transcribed to text despite excellent recognition of the command by the program.  The command itself appears as text, as opposed to the intended content of the command.

  Is this a capacity issue?
  It is only occurring with new commands, the previously existing commands functioning perfectly.
  How can I increase the capacity of global commands text if this is  really the problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I run DNS 9 and have had no problems until recently.    I think it is a brilliant office tool. My global commands was working perfectly until recently, when I discovered that new voice commands were not being transcribed to text despite excellent recognition of the command by the program.  The command itself appears as text, as opposed to the intended content of the command.</p>
<p>  Is this a capacity issue?<br />
  It is only occurring with new commands, the previously existing commands functioning perfectly.<br />
  How can I increase the capacity of global commands text if this is  really the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Webster</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-226986</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Webster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 13:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-226986</guid>
		<description>I have tried and tried to get some accuracy out of Dragon 9.5, but cannot, despite hours of training.  After hours of training, it says "adapting user files" and offers a calculating time varying from 12 minutes to several hours, depending on how long the session has been, but not long after, the popup box disappears from the screen (quietly, no sign of a crash) with no notification to say whether the files have been successfully adapted or not.  But on trying to use the program again, accuracy is back to rubbish.  I had used Dragon 5 and 6 before with much greater success than this newer version. Maybe the extra bells and whistles just confuse it - who knows.  I think this program is vastly overpriced for what it does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried and tried to get some accuracy out of Dragon 9.5, but cannot, despite hours of training.  After hours of training, it says &#8220;adapting user files&#8221; and offers a calculating time varying from 12 minutes to several hours, depending on how long the session has been, but not long after, the popup box disappears from the screen (quietly, no sign of a crash) with no notification to say whether the files have been successfully adapted or not.  But on trying to use the program again, accuracy is back to rubbish.  I had used Dragon 5 and 6 before with much greater success than this newer version. Maybe the extra bells and whistles just confuse it - who knows.  I think this program is vastly overpriced for what it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wilson Mar</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-225013</link>
		<dc:creator>Wilson Mar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-225013</guid>
		<description>Have you experienced the nightmare that is Nuance support?

All I got from their email support was canned emails. It's obvious that they didn't read what I wrote. I wasn't able to log in to their website, and they kept sending me the same reply over and over (8 times).

After a lot of searching, I got through on a phone. The agent promised to research my situation, but then I never heard back from him.

I've found dozens of complaints like mine on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you experienced the nightmare that is Nuance support?</p>
<p>All I got from their email support was canned emails. It&#8217;s obvious that they didn&#8217;t read what I wrote. I wasn&#8217;t able to log in to their website, and they kept sending me the same reply over and over (8 times).</p>
<p>After a lot of searching, I got through on a phone. The agent promised to research my situation, but then I never heard back from him.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve found dozens of complaints like mine on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frustrated Student</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-156553</link>
		<dc:creator>Frustrated Student</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 04:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-156553</guid>
		<description>I purchased DNS to transcribe audiotaped interviews. I installed the program and successfully trained. I continued training a couple of times and obtained excellent results. Now, when I go into the program to continue to train the Dragon I get text that doesn't even partially reflect what I have spoken. I've trying to go into accuracy center to train that way, but it just keeps giving me the same first sentence over and over again, with no progress in the window. Audio quality is tested as good.Anybody have an idea re: what has happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I purchased DNS to transcribe audiotaped interviews. I installed the program and successfully trained. I continued training a couple of times and obtained excellent results. Now, when I go into the program to continue to train the Dragon I get text that doesn&#8217;t even partially reflect what I have spoken. I&#8217;ve trying to go into accuracy center to train that way, but it just keeps giving me the same first sentence over and over again, with no progress in the window. Audio quality is tested as good.Anybody have an idea re: what has happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Trebeck</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-155121</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Trebeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-155121</guid>
		<description>I personally think Dragon NaturallySpeaking means a great program!  In fact, I'm actually writing this review using the program.  In my opinion, I believe the program is faulty however the mistakes it makes are minuscule compared to the typing mistakes are often made and the time it saves you always outweighs the Slight inaccuracies  this program produces.  However I don't deserve to be complaining because my Dragon NaturallySpeaking mic broke.  So I have to use an 11-year-old stand mic.  So even though I don't have the most expensive mikc.  The program still functions very well for what I need for, this is definitely worth the money you have to pay for it and I recommend getting the more expensive and newer version, because I'm sure it's better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally think Dragon NaturallySpeaking means a great program!  In fact, I&#8217;m actually writing this review using the program.  In my opinion, I believe the program is faulty however the mistakes it makes are minuscule compared to the typing mistakes are often made and the time it saves you always outweighs the Slight inaccuracies  this program produces.  However I don&#8217;t deserve to be complaining because my Dragon NaturallySpeaking mic broke.  So I have to use an 11-year-old stand mic.  So even though I don&#8217;t have the most expensive mikc.  The program still functions very well for what I need for, this is definitely worth the money you have to pay for it and I recommend getting the more expensive and newer version, because I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Maddern</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-150258</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Maddern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-150258</guid>
		<description>If anyone is interested, I just posted my first impressions of
the newly released Dragon NaturallySpeaking version 10 (UK version) at

http://speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Newsletter/

I'd be interested in hearing your thoughts if you've tried it. Please
leave a comment after the article (click on the "comments" link underneath the article)

Peter Maddern</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone is interested, I just posted my first impressions of<br />
the newly released Dragon NaturallySpeaking version 10 (UK version) at</p>
<p><a href="http://speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Newsletter/" rel="nofollow">http://speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Newsletter/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in hearing your thoughts if you&#8217;ve tried it. Please<br />
leave a comment after the article (click on the &#8220;comments&#8221; link underneath the article)</p>
<p>Peter Maddern</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Crosby</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-146666</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Crosby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 19:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-146666</guid>
		<description>I've tried DNS 9.0, and found it works surprisingly well. Setup was no issue, although I did find that a better quality microphone/headset contributed to training and application accuracy. I use it in a quasi-technical environment, where it has proven really useful - even a few 'obtuse' words were correctly called and inserted to the document.

I find that accuracy and 'flow' are dramatically better in the 'Dragon Pad' app, compared to others. For example, input to Thunderbird mail windows is excruciatingly slow - to the point of being useless. I would be interesting to know if others have had a similar experience in their use of DNS?

bc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried DNS 9.0, and found it works surprisingly well. Setup was no issue, although I did find that a better quality microphone/headset contributed to training and application accuracy. I use it in a quasi-technical environment, where it has proven really useful - even a few &#8216;obtuse&#8217; words were correctly called and inserted to the document.</p>
<p>I find that accuracy and &#8216;flow&#8217; are dramatically better in the &#8216;Dragon Pad&#8217; app, compared to others. For example, input to Thunderbird mail windows is excruciatingly slow - to the point of being useless. I would be interesting to know if others have had a similar experience in their use of DNS?</p>
<p>bc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Mefferd</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-143710</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Mefferd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-143710</guid>
		<description>I own another is ScanSoft program OmniPage and recently got two new computers when I installed them i.e. ScanSoft OmniPage.  I had a strange thing happened to my program and had diminished features and ScanSoft said that I had the program installed on too many computers.

Here's the point.  I have used NaturallySpeaking for about a decade now and every time it comes out with a new version it seems as if the accuracy of my current version all of a sudden gets a lot worse.  I was wondering if anybody had the same problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own another is ScanSoft program OmniPage and recently got two new computers when I installed them i.e. ScanSoft OmniPage.  I had a strange thing happened to my program and had diminished features and ScanSoft said that I had the program installed on too many computers.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the point.  I have used NaturallySpeaking for about a decade now and every time it comes out with a new version it seems as if the accuracy of my current version all of a sudden gets a lot worse.  I was wondering if anybody had the same problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Tripp</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-142079</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Tripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-142079</guid>
		<description>Dear Peter:

We live in a wonderful age.  Here I am in St. Louis, Missouri, USA and you are helping me from the UK!

The check you suggested for Sound discovered no problems.  I tried using the Dragonpad approach and still the dictation was garbled.  I went to the Acer HD Audio Manager and increased the microphone recording level and invoked the Boost feature.  This helped a little, but the error rate during dictation was still unacceptably high.

The solution for me was to start Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9.5 and then open an Internet connection using Windows Explorer.  I use Google Gmail.  There was virtually no problem dictating as an email.  Some of the formatting features are missing such as use of the Tab key, but on the whole this is a solution for me, with the usual corrections in dictation that Dragon requires.  

I copied the email dictation into Microsoft Word 2007 and made the necessary formatting changes.  I am puzzeled why this method works so well on the Internet.  There is some kind of problem with the microphone when using it soley with Dragonpad or dictating into Microsoft Word.

Again thanks for your quick response.  

Rich Tripp

PS.  My Tripp relatives emigrated to the USA from Horkstow, England about 1600.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Peter:</p>
<p>We live in a wonderful age.  Here I am in St. Louis, Missouri, USA and you are helping me from the UK!</p>
<p>The check you suggested for Sound discovered no problems.  I tried using the Dragonpad approach and still the dictation was garbled.  I went to the Acer HD Audio Manager and increased the microphone recording level and invoked the Boost feature.  This helped a little, but the error rate during dictation was still unacceptably high.</p>
<p>The solution for me was to start Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9.5 and then open an Internet connection using Windows Explorer.  I use Google Gmail.  There was virtually no problem dictating as an email.  Some of the formatting features are missing such as use of the Tab key, but on the whole this is a solution for me, with the usual corrections in dictation that Dragon requires.  </p>
<p>I copied the email dictation into Microsoft Word 2007 and made the necessary formatting changes.  I am puzzeled why this method works so well on the Internet.  There is some kind of problem with the microphone when using it soley with Dragonpad or dictating into Microsoft Word.</p>
<p>Again thanks for your quick response.  </p>
<p>Rich Tripp</p>
<p>PS.  My Tripp relatives emigrated to the USA from Horkstow, England about 1600.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Maddern</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-141810</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Maddern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-141810</guid>
		<description>Don't know for sure but it sounds like your sound system is introducing stray sounds.

Try making a recording in Vista'a sound recorder. To access it, click on the windows start button bottom left hand corner and type "sound" in the "start search" box. Select sound recorder. Save the recording on your desktop and double click to play it back.

If the recording is clean with no electronic noise then your sound card is doing a good job. If it's a noisy playback (static noise, humming and the like, your sound card is sub optimum or badly shielded.

The solution would be to connect a USB sound adapter to the NC-91.

A word about the NC-91. It should be considered a starter micropANC-hone. It has good recording quality but won't cancel all the background noise even though the NC stands for "noise cancelling". You'd do better with an Andrea 700. ANC stands for "active noise cancellation" and as the name suggests, it actively cancels out background noise.

If you have further questions, consider posting on our UK Dragon forum at

www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Forum

Peter Maddern
Speech Empowered Computing, UK
www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know for sure but it sounds like your sound system is introducing stray sounds.</p>
<p>Try making a recording in Vista&#8217;a sound recorder. To access it, click on the windows start button bottom left hand corner and type &#8220;sound&#8221; in the &#8220;start search&#8221; box. Select sound recorder. Save the recording on your desktop and double click to play it back.</p>
<p>If the recording is clean with no electronic noise then your sound card is doing a good job. If it&#8217;s a noisy playback (static noise, humming and the like, your sound card is sub optimum or badly shielded.</p>
<p>The solution would be to connect a USB sound adapter to the NC-91.</p>
<p>A word about the NC-91. It should be considered a starter micropANC-hone. It has good recording quality but won&#8217;t cancel all the background noise even though the NC stands for &#8220;noise cancelling&#8221;. You&#8217;d do better with an Andrea 700. ANC stands for &#8220;active noise cancellation&#8221; and as the name suggests, it actively cancels out background noise.</p>
<p>If you have further questions, consider posting on our UK Dragon forum at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Forum" rel="nofollow">http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Forum</a></p>
<p>Peter Maddern<br />
Speech Empowered Computing, UK<br />
<a href="http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Tripp</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-141793</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Tripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-141793</guid>
		<description>I use Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9 on Windows Vista.  I use an Andrea NC-91 microphone.  All works well for a while and then something automatically launches Windows Media Player.  After this the microphone no longer recognizes dictation.  A note says the volume is too low.  Raising the volume of the microphone creates too much noise for the dictation to be good.  Any thoughts?

Sincerely,

Rich Tripp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9 on Windows Vista.  I use an Andrea NC-91 microphone.  All works well for a while and then something automatically launches Windows Media Player.  After this the microphone no longer recognizes dictation.  A note says the volume is too low.  Raising the volume of the microphone creates too much noise for the dictation to be good.  Any thoughts?</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Rich Tripp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1kitty</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-125022</link>
		<dc:creator>1kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 16:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-125022</guid>
		<description>To Tom (24)- you need to disable power management ("always on" in windows) and processor speed-step.  Dragon reads your current cpu and pentium laptops have stepping processor so it thinks your cpu is lower. In linux running gnome (Ubuntu hardy) add cpufreq scaling monitor,  Reconfigure gnome
&#62; sudo dpkg-reconfigure gnome-applets
and choose "yes"
Now right click in cpufreq scaling icon/applet and set the freq to the max for your cpu.
I struggled with this for some time....if running a vmware virtual machine, specify your full CPU speed in kHz in /etc/vmware/config
by adding this line with your cpu max speed replacing 1800000 (mine is 1.8GHz):
host.cpukHz = 1800000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Tom (24)- you need to disable power management (&#8221;always on&#8221; in windows) and processor speed-step.  Dragon reads your current cpu and pentium laptops have stepping processor so it thinks your cpu is lower. In linux running gnome (Ubuntu hardy) add cpufreq scaling monitor,  Reconfigure gnome<br />
&gt; sudo dpkg-reconfigure gnome-applets<br />
and choose &#8220;yes&#8221;<br />
Now right click in cpufreq scaling icon/applet and set the freq to the max for your cpu.<br />
I struggled with this for some time&#8230;.if running a vmware virtual machine, specify your full CPU speed in kHz in /etc/vmware/config<br />
by adding this line with your cpu max speed replacing 1800000 (mine is 1.8GHz):<br />
host.cpukHz = 1800000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-123455</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-123455</guid>
		<description>I have had several versions of DNS and now have version 9.  I have found all versions to be clunky (a highly technical software term.  DNS9 did seem to be an advance over the others.  

However, I recently had to reformat my hard drive and reload DNS9.  Ok, I got it up and went through the training routines and gave the program all accesses to documents, e-mail, etc. to familiarize it with whatever it familiarizes itself with.  Now it acts as though it is retarded with a speech impediment.  It is virtually non-functional.

I would appreciate it if anyone might have a suggestion as to how to correct this problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had several versions of DNS and now have version 9.  I have found all versions to be clunky (a highly technical software term.  DNS9 did seem to be an advance over the others.  </p>
<p>However, I recently had to reformat my hard drive and reload DNS9.  Ok, I got it up and went through the training routines and gave the program all accesses to documents, e-mail, etc. to familiarize it with whatever it familiarizes itself with.  Now it acts as though it is retarded with a speech impediment.  It is virtually non-functional.</p>
<p>I would appreciate it if anyone might have a suggestion as to how to correct this problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-117790</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-117790</guid>
		<description>Dragon Natural Speaking 9 is indeed a crummy piece of work. Sometimes it might work, but mostly it's not dependable. Tough to train accurately it's a software that Nuance figures most people will just get by with and not complain.  If you're looking for something that will type accurately, then you'll have to pay a heck of a lot more, like around three grand.  I bought DNS9 and sorry that I did. Also, Nuance support stinks. So, had a bad experience at Fry's where I bought it, a bad experience with trying to get it to work well and an awful experience with Nuance.  By the way, I started with Dragon Speaking 6 and frankly, DNS9 isn't much better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dragon Natural Speaking 9 is indeed a crummy piece of work. Sometimes it might work, but mostly it&#8217;s not dependable. Tough to train accurately it&#8217;s a software that Nuance figures most people will just get by with and not complain.  If you&#8217;re looking for something that will type accurately, then you&#8217;ll have to pay a heck of a lot more, like around three grand.  I bought DNS9 and sorry that I did. Also, Nuance support stinks. So, had a bad experience at Fry&#8217;s where I bought it, a bad experience with trying to get it to work well and an awful experience with Nuance.  By the way, I started with Dragon Speaking 6 and frankly, DNS9 isn&#8217;t much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-88754</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-88754</guid>
		<description>Hi All,

I have problem to install DNS9, error msg is :"The processor is not adequate for running Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9", 
my system is:
Dell Inspiron I6000, Pentium 4, processor 1.73GHz, 367 MHz, 512 MB of RAM, OS version is Windows XP home Version 2002 SP2

Any idea how to fix it ? Thanks.

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p>
<p>I have problem to install DNS9, error msg is :&#8221;The processor is not adequate for running Dragon NaturallySpeaking 9&#8243;,<br />
my system is:<br />
Dell Inspiron I6000, Pentium 4, processor 1.73GHz, 367 MHz, 512 MB of RAM, OS version is Windows XP home Version 2002 SP2</p>
<p>Any idea how to fix it ? Thanks.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Maddern</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-85285</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Maddern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 22:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-85285</guid>
		<description>In order to try to help you:-

What version of Dragon 9 do you have - 9.0, 9.1 0r 9,5? 

What operating system are you running (Windows XP or Vista)?

How much RAM do you have?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to try to help you:-</p>
<p>What version of Dragon 9 do you have - 9.0, 9.1 0r 9,5? </p>
<p>What operating system are you running (Windows XP or Vista)?</p>
<p>How much RAM do you have?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cecil mcfarland</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-84938</link>
		<dc:creator>cecil mcfarland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 01:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-84938</guid>
		<description>My new 9 Preferred won't load.  A Widows Installer window opens, you click on Ok and nothing happens

I have turned off anti virus software and the firewall. 


Any suggestions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My new 9 Preferred won&#8217;t load.  A Widows Installer window opens, you click on Ok and nothing happens</p>
<p>I have turned off anti virus software and the firewall. </p>
<p>Any suggestions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Maddern</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-82188</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Maddern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-82188</guid>
		<description>According to Nuance, makers of Dragon NaturallySpeaking (DNS), most people type at 40 wpm and dictate at 120 wpm. (Actually, if you were reading from a script, Dragon could keep up with dictation at up to 160 wpm!).

The following is a simplistic comparison:-

Create a 1000 word document by manual typing:-

Typing speed - 40 wpm
Time to type 1000 words = 25 minutes
Run spell checker = 1 minute
Total time to create finished document = 26 minutes

Create a 1000 word document by dictation with DNS:-

Brainstorm bullet points (key topic areas) = 2 minutes (guess)
Dictation speed – 120 wpm
Time to dictate 1000 words = 8.3 minutes
Make corrections within DNS = 3 minutes (guess)
Total time to create finished document = 13.3 minutes

Conclusion – half the time using DNS

I’m not 100% sure of the above assumptions but they at least give a good indication that speech recognition is faster than manual typing.

For longer documents, the time saving would become even better with DNS as the word creation part would be an increasing percentage of the total document creation effort.

As everyone is individual, the best would be to run a comparison test yourself by creating two different documents of approximately the same length (but obviously differing in content) using the above techniques and time the results.

I would only use a Mind Map if I wanted to create a large report or if “content quality” was more important than time to complete. A simple list of bullet points doesn’t take long to fashion.

By the way, here are some resources for UK users:-

Our Speech Empowered Computing Blog with tips for using DNS is at

http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Newsletter/

and our Q &#38; A forum is at 

http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Forum/

Peter
www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Nuance, makers of Dragon NaturallySpeaking (DNS), most people type at 40 wpm and dictate at 120 wpm. (Actually, if you were reading from a script, Dragon could keep up with dictation at up to 160 wpm!).</p>
<p>The following is a simplistic comparison:-</p>
<p>Create a 1000 word document by manual typing:-</p>
<p>Typing speed - 40 wpm<br />
Time to type 1000 words = 25 minutes<br />
Run spell checker = 1 minute<br />
Total time to create finished document = 26 minutes</p>
<p>Create a 1000 word document by dictation with DNS:-</p>
<p>Brainstorm bullet points (key topic areas) = 2 minutes (guess)<br />
Dictation speed – 120 wpm<br />
Time to dictate 1000 words = 8.3 minutes<br />
Make corrections within DNS = 3 minutes (guess)<br />
Total time to create finished document = 13.3 minutes</p>
<p>Conclusion – half the time using DNS</p>
<p>I’m not 100% sure of the above assumptions but they at least give a good indication that speech recognition is faster than manual typing.</p>
<p>For longer documents, the time saving would become even better with DNS as the word creation part would be an increasing percentage of the total document creation effort.</p>
<p>As everyone is individual, the best would be to run a comparison test yourself by creating two different documents of approximately the same length (but obviously differing in content) using the above techniques and time the results.</p>
<p>I would only use a Mind Map if I wanted to create a large report or if “content quality” was more important than time to complete. A simple list of bullet points doesn’t take long to fashion.</p>
<p>By the way, here are some resources for UK users:-</p>
<p>Our Speech Empowered Computing Blog with tips for using DNS is at</p>
<p><a href="http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Newsletter/" rel="nofollow">http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Newsletter/</a></p>
<p>and our Q &amp; A forum is at </p>
<p><a href="http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Forum/" rel="nofollow">http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk/Forum/</a></p>
<p>Peter<br />
<a href="http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.speechempoweredcomputing.co.uk</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NR</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-82069</link>
		<dc:creator>NR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 03:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-82069</guid>
		<description>Allow me to jump in for a comment here.  

Somewhere along the way I was told to practice things like, 'Period/paragraph/tab' or, 'Spell xxx/question mark/paragraph/indent.' and just watch the cursor move and see what it takes to get into the real dictating. Those are the kind of things you will be dictating at the end of a line, or in a line (until you make one word macros, that along with keybording will begin to save you time and maybe even save your style--but that's a different post).

Well, for me it worked and gave me a sense for the way Dragon hears.

The recent poster, is asking how 'fast' things go and how much time you will save.  Please see the posting from NR above to get my views. I would add that "points", bullett or talking or what have you, are not necessary preparation for everyone.  I would suggest that Dragon be used as a boiler plate for awhile (maybe even for "Points") to get the sense of it.

Cheers
NR
I am NOT affiliated with ANY dealer, manufacturer or retailer of any kind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allow me to jump in for a comment here.  </p>
<p>Somewhere along the way I was told to practice things like, &#8216;Period/paragraph/tab&#8217; or, &#8216;Spell xxx/question mark/paragraph/indent.&#8217; and just watch the cursor move and see what it takes to get into the real dictating. Those are the kind of things you will be dictating at the end of a line, or in a line (until you make one word macros, that along with keybording will begin to save you time and maybe even save your style&#8211;but that&#8217;s a different post).</p>
<p>Well, for me it worked and gave me a sense for the way Dragon hears.</p>
<p>The recent poster, is asking how &#8216;fast&#8217; things go and how much time you will save.  Please see the posting from NR above to get my views. I would add that &#8220;points&#8221;, bullett or talking or what have you, are not necessary preparation for everyone.  I would suggest that Dragon be used as a boiler plate for awhile (maybe even for &#8220;Points&#8221;) to get the sense of it.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
NR<br />
I am NOT affiliated with ANY dealer, manufacturer or retailer of any kind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CT</title>
		<link>http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/comment-page-1/#comment-82049</link>
		<dc:creator>CT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theblogjoint.com/2007/02/24/dragon-naturally-speaking-9-review/#comment-82049</guid>
		<description>Yes Peter,

This helps.  At least your explanation of what's going on clarifies things for me considerably.  I understand you to be saying that I have to become accustomed to thinking BEFORE I dictate rather than trying to dictate in the same mode that I type.  What I am wondering is if doing the bullet points and mind maps before you dictate eats up a lot of the time you save by not having to type everything out?  This is an important question for me because one of the reasons I purchased NS9 was to save time.  I will still use it even if it doesn't save a lot of time because I believe there are other benefits to the software.  But I am just wondering how long it will take me to get up to speed with sort of rewiring the way I work..and if my productivity will suffer as a result.  Your thoughts/observations?

Regards,

CT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Peter,</p>
<p>This helps.  At least your explanation of what&#8217;s going on clarifies things for me considerably.  I understand you to be saying that I have to become accustomed to thinking BEFORE I dictate rather than trying to dictate in the same mode that I type.  What I am wondering is if doing the bullet points and mind maps before you dictate eats up a lot of the time you save by not having to type everything out?  This is an important question for me because one of the reasons I purchased NS9 was to save time.  I will still use it even if it doesn&#8217;t save a lot of time because I believe there are other benefits to the software.  But I am just wondering how long it will take me to get up to speed with sort of rewiring the way I work..and if my productivity will suffer as a result.  Your thoughts/observations?</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>CT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
